Social commentator and institutional reform advocate, Segun Awosanya, popularly known as Segalink, has argued that Nigerian activists seeking elective positions in the 2027 general election are unlikely to deliver the transformational change many expect.
Speaking during an interview on Vanguard News‘ Politics Hub, Segalink said the ability to influence society does not depend on holding political office, stressing that individuals committed to national development should already be making meaningful contributions from their current positions.
According to him, activists often lose the moral authority that made them credible voices for change once they become politicians.
“They cannot make a difference. If they can, they should be able to make a difference from where they are,” he said.
Using himself as an example, Segalink maintained that he has consistently contributed to nation-building without seeking political appointments or elective office.
“I am not a politician, but I am making a difference from where I am. I am not searching for power or political appointments, but you can trace the trajectory of what I have been doing over the years and see the importance and impact in real time in society,” he stated.
The reform advocate also raised concerns over what he described as the growing culture of online political “cults” and echo chambers, alleging that some supporters are more focused on defending political personalities than engaging with ideas or constructive debates.
He claimed that certain impressionable Nigerians have formed online groups that attack anyone unwilling to lead or manipulate them for political purposes.
Without mentioning any political figure, Segalink urged Nigerians to embrace their individual responsibility in nation-building instead of relying on politicians or influencers to determine their choices.
“I am simply saying that you have a power within you, a responsibility in your society. You can make a difference in your country without necessarily needing someone to tell you who to follow, who to abuse, or who to vote for or not,” he said.
He concluded that lasting national development begins with citizens taking responsibility for their communities, insisting that genuine leadership is defined by consistent service rather than the pursuit of political office.
Comments