Nigeria’s political landscape was thrown into turmoil on Thursday following the decision by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to de-recognise David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola as National Chairman and National Secretary of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
The move has ignited widespread reactions across the country, deepening political tensions ahead of the 2027 general elections, as opposition figures allege deliberate interference, while the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Presidency insist the action is lawful and justified.
ADC Defies INEC, Alleges Threat to Democracy
At a press briefing in Abuja, Mark led ADC stakeholders in condemning INEC’s decision, describing it as a direct threat to Nigeria’s multi-party democracy. He questioned the motive of President Bola Tinubu, asking why a government with majority control of the National Assembly and over 30 state governors would fear political competition.
The party maintained that it would proceed with its scheduled congresses and national convention despite INEC’s refusal to monitor the processes. It also accused the commission of acting in contempt of court and called for the resignation of its leadership.
INEC Cites Court Order, Maintains Neutrality
INEC, however, defended its position, stating that the decision followed a ruling by the Court of Appeal directing parties to maintain the status quo pending the determination of a substantive suit before the Federal High Court.
The commission clarified that it would not recognise any faction within the ADC, including claims by another aspirant seeking leadership of the party, until the legal dispute is resolved. It also dismissed calls for the removal of its chairman, insisting that such processes are constitutionally regulated.
Opposition Cries Foul, APC Fires Back
Prominent opposition figures, including Peter Obi, alongside groups such as Afenifere, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and the Middle Belt Forum, criticised INEC’s action, warning that it could undermine democratic stability and weaken opposition parties.
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) described the development as part of a broader attempt to tilt the political playing field ahead of 2027.
In contrast, the APC dismissed the allegations, accusing the ADC of internal mismanagement and legal violations. The party argued that the leadership crisis was self-inflicted and that INEC’s decision was consistent with electoral laws and judicial directives.
Heightened Security as Tensions Rise
Amid fears of unrest, security agencies deployed heavily around INEC headquarters in Abuja to prevent clashes between opposing protest groups. The presence of armed personnel underscored the heightened political tension triggered by the controversy.
Presidency Weighs In
The Presidency aligned with the APC’s stance, dismissing claims of political interference and urging ADC leaders to properly understand the legal concept of “status quo ante bellum,” which underpins INEC’s decision.
Growing Concerns Ahead of 2027
Analysts warn that the dispute reflects widening cracks within Nigeria’s political system, with fears that escalating conflicts between electoral authorities and opposition parties could shape the credibility of the 2027 elections.
Despite the legal uncertainty, the ADC insists it will continue its political activities, setting the stage for a prolonged confrontation that could redefine opposition politics in Nigeria.
Comments