The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has reaffirmed his unwavering support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, stating that he has no regrets about backing the President during the 2023 general elections.
Speaking during a thanksgiving service organised by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Ochigba, Ahoada East and West Local Government Areas of Rivers State, Wike expressed gratitude to Tinubu for appointing him to serve as the FCT Minister.
Wike, who served as Rivers State governor for eight years under the PDP, faced criticism within his party for his decision to support the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate in the presidential election. However, he remains resolute in his stance.
“I have no regrets, and I have no apologies. If the opportunity arises again, I will make the same decision,” Wike declared during the event.
The Minister also addressed allegations of land grabbing leveled against him by some residents of Abuja, describing the claims as unfounded and absurd. He emphasized his commitment to upholding due process in land administration within the Federal Capital Territory.
“I am responsible for the management of land in Abuja. How can I grab what I am in charge of?” Wike questioned.
He further warned individuals occupying government land to regularize their ownership or risk losing their plots, reiterating his resolve to ensure compliance with the law.
“We must thank Mr. President for giving us this opportunity. If he hadn’t, we wouldn’t have realized the complexity of managing the entire nation’s capital. In Rivers State, we thought governance was challenging, but Abuja is a different ballgame,” he noted.
Wike dismissed criticisms and negative labels from detractors, asserting that such actions would not deter him from doing what is right.
“No matter the propaganda, no matter the names you call me, the right thing must be done,” he concluded.
The thanksgiving service, attended by PDP members and other dignitaries, highlighted Wike’s continued influence in both Rivers State and the national political landscape.
Comments